Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Tata Value | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | HDFC Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 17% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 16% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Mid Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 17% of their portfolios | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Tata Value share 16% of their portfolios | itself | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and HDFC Mid Cap share 12% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Tata Value share 7% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 12% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and HDFC Mid Cap Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Tata Value | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | HDFC Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Value | Flexi Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 87% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 40% of 109 | 66% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.86% points | 1.15% points | 0.68% points | 0.92% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 52% | 81% | 41% | 38% |
| Run by P7 | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Ajay Tyagi · 11 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 7.0% | 0.2% | −2.3% | 6.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.6% | 12.9% | 8.4% | 17.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 18.0% | 13.3% | 4.9% | 18.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.9% | −20.9% | −20.1% | −16.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹23,434 Cr | ₹1.07 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 11 yrs | 12 yrs | 10 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 105 · 25% | 41 · 52% | 62 · 44% | 81 · 37% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.