Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid | Canara Robeco Aggressive Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid | itself | 35% |
| Canara Robeco Aggressive Hybrid | 35% | itself |
Most alike: ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund and Canara Robeco Aggressive Hybrid Fund share 35% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid | Canara Robeco Aggressive Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Aggressive Hybrid | Aggressive Hybrid |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 90% of 109 | 60% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.93% | 1.25% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 54% | 35% |
| Run by P7 | Manish Banthia · 13 yrs | Avnish Jain · ≥ 1.1 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | 1.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 13.3% | 11.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 14.1% | 9.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −11.2% | −12.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹52,683 Cr | ₹11,396 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 4.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 254 · 37% | 136 · 30% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.