Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Quant Small Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | UTI Value | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | itself | Quant Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and UTI Value share 6% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 4% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and UTI Value share 8% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 8% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Quant Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | UTI Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | itself | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Quant Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: UTI Value Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quant Small Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | UTI Value | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Small Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 69% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 37% of 109 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.84% points | 2.00% points | 0.79% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 75% | 68% | 47% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | 12.7% | 10.4% | −4.1% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.5% | 25.3% | 12.1% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.2% | 20.0% | 11.0% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −24.4% | −22.8% | −17.2% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹34,069 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 7.5 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 12 yrs | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 120 · 43% | 265 · 30% | 71 · 41% | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.