Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Quant Small Cap | UTI Value | Axis Small Cap | Nippon India Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | itself | Quant Small Cap and UTI Value share 6% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Axis Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Quant Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself | UTI Value and Axis Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 12% of their portfolios |
| Axis Small CapSmall Cap | Axis Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | Axis Small Cap and UTI Value share 7% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 29% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and UTI Value share 12% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Axis Small Cap share 29% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Axis Small Cap Fund and Nippon India Small Cap Fund share 29% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quant Small Cap | UTI Value | Axis Small Cap | Nippon India Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Value | Small Cap | Small Cap |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 69% of 109 | 37% of 109 | 42% of 109 | 90% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.84% points | 0.79% points | 1.44% points | 1.10% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 75% | 47% | 63% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | not known | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 12.7% | −4.1% | 10.0% | 8.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.5% | 12.1% | 16.2% | 16.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.2% | 11.0% | 16.4% | 19.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −24.4% | −17.2% | −19.4% | −24.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹34,069 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹27,535 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 7.5 yrs | 12 yrs | 5.9 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 120 · 43% | 71 · 41% | 132 · 25% | 257 · 16% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.