ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Quant Small Cap FundSmall Cap×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • SBI SMALL CAP FUNDSmall Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherQuant Small CapNippon India Growth Mid CapKotak Mid CapSBI SMALL CAP
Quant Small CapSmall Cap
itself
Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios
Quant Small Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Quant Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 3% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Quant Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 4% of their portfolios
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Quant Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and SBI SMALL CAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
SBI SMALL CAPSmall Cap
SBI SMALL CAP and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios
SBI SMALL CAP and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios
SBI SMALL CAP and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Quant Small Cap Fund and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund, share 4%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureQuant Small CapNippon India Growth Mid CapKotak Mid CapSBI SMALL CAP
CategorySmall CapMid CapMid CapSmall Cap
Fund housequant Money Managers LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.SBI Funds Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P469% of 10987% of 10983% of 10949% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.84% points0.86% points1.44% points1.31% points
Portfolio turned over a year P175%52%not measured54%
Run by P7Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrsRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsnot knownR Srinivasan · ≥ 3 mo
1-year return12.7%7.0%4.8%6.6%
3 years p.a.18.5%18.6%18.1%12.3%
5 years p.a.19.2%18.0%16.8%14.2%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−24.4%−19.9%−20.9%−22.4%
Assets (AUM)₹34,069 Cr₹48,143 Cr₹64,136 Cr₹39,942 Cr
Disclosed history7.5 yrs14 yrs—5.8 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight120 · 43%105 · 25%none disclosed73 · 37%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.