Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Quant Small Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | itself | Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 3% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Quant Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 19% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Quant Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 19% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quant Small Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap | Large Cap |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 69% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 73% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.84% points | 0.86% points | 1.44% points | 1.01% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 75% | 52% | not measured | 57% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs |
| 1-year return | 12.7% | 7.0% | 4.8% | −4.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.5% | 18.6% | 18.1% | 11.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.2% | 18.0% | 16.8% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −24.4% | −19.9% | −20.9% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹34,069 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 7.5 yrs | 14 yrs | — | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 120 · 43% | 105 · 25% | none disclosed | 69 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.