Forbes Precision Tools and Mach Pts Ltd.
No fund holds it No fund disclosed this company in the latest holdings month (Aug 2026) or the two before it. Funds have owned it: the price history is below, and the flow lists show who left.
Who holds it
every fund's latest position, when it first appeared, and the price then against now · 0 rows: 0 holders and recent exits
| Fund | Weight | Since | Entry close | Now vs entry | 3-mo change | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No fund disclosed this stock in the latest month. | ||||||
A holder disclosed the stock in the latest month or the one before; an exit is listed for three disclosures. Entry close is the split- and bonus-adjusted close at the end of the month the fund first disclosed the position; “now vs entry” is price only, not the fund's return on the position. Estimated cost basis per fund from monthly unit deltas is not computed in this build.
Three-month flow
not computed
net change in Σ fund weight over the last three disclosures (percentage points summed across funds) · 0 added or entered, 0 trimmed or exited
Crowding
0 funds hold it, at an average weight of — each (0.0% summed across holders). Days-to-exit needs the aggregate MF share count and average volume; not computed for this stock.
Who moved last quarter
the three-month flow, fund by fund — largest move first
One year
daily BSE close, unadjusted — the exchange publishes nothing to adjust from
Prices are the BSE close. This series is not adjusted for splits or bonuses. It cannot be: the BSE never adjusts its published previous close — measured, it matched the previous session’s close on every one of 811,633 consecutive pairs in 2026 — and the NSE’s corporate-action list is keyed by NSE symbol, which a company that never listed there does not have. So a split reads here as a one-day fall. Saying that is better than implying an adjustment that did not happen.