ANVESHAN
Theme
Create account
Fund manager · icicipru

Preference Shares

icicipru “Preference Shares ^”
Funds run now
0
of 1 ever named on
Longest current tenure
no current fund in the archive
In the archive
Aug 2022 – Nov 2023
16 fund-months across every stint
Stints ahead of category
0 of 1
annualised return vs the category median, in-tenure

Tenure across funds

each stint as the factsheets dated it

2023ICICI Prudential Multi Ca…ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund: Aug 2022 – Nov 2023 · fund manager · date as printed Aug 2022Nov 2023
2023ICICI Prudential Multi Ca…ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund: Aug 2022 – Nov 2023 · fund manager · date as printed Aug 2022Nov 2023
2023ICICI Prudential Multi Ca…ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund: Aug 2022 – Nov 2023 · fund manager · date as printed Aug 2022Nov 2023
running it nowearlier

The record, stint by stint

fund against category over exactly those months

FundRoleFromToMonthsFundCategoryExcessP4 in tenure
ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund
ICICIPRU · Multi Cap
fund manager Aug 2022 Nov 2023 16 24.8% p.a. 25.6% p.a. −0.83 pp under 3 yrs

* dated by first appearance in the archive we hold, not by a date the factsheet printed. Months are the stint's calendar months. Returns are the fund's primary growth class and the category's median monthly return, compounded over the same months; “P4 in tenure” counts only rolling three-year windows that lie wholly inside the stint. A dash means the NAV or the category median did not cover the months — a category with too few funds in this build has no median.

Why this might matter

A fund's five-year figure belongs to whoever ran it for those five years. Following the person across funds is the only way to see a record that survives a change of employer — and to notice when a fund's record predates the people now running it.

Why it might not

co-managed funds attribute the same months to every named manager, so a record here is the team's before it is anyone's. A factsheet names the manager of record, not who made each call, and fund houses have processes and research desks that outlast individuals. Nothing on this page ranks anyone.