Prakash Gaurav Goel
Tenure across funds
each stint as the factsheets dated it
The record, stint by stint
fund against category over exactly those months
| Fund | Role | From | To | Months | Fund | Category | Excess | P4 in tenure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 ICICIPRU · Growth | fund manager | Oct 2017 | now | 41 | 8.3% p.a. | 8.0% p.a. | +0.39 pp | 60% of 5 |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 17 ICICIPRU · Growth | fund manager | Oct 2017 | now | 42 | 8.8% p.a. | 8.1% p.a. | +0.66 pp | 83% of 6 |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 18 ICICIPRU · Growth | fund manager | Nov 2017 | now | 42 | 11.5% p.a. | 6.0% p.a. | +5.49 pp | 100% of 6 |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 12 ICICIPRU · Growth | fund manager | Apr 2019 | now | 21 | 4.9% p.a. | 8.3% p.a. | −3.37 pp | under 3 yrs |
| ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap Fund ICICIPRU · Large & Mid Cap | fund manager | Oct 2017 | Apr 2021 | 43 | 9.8% p.a. | 12.3% p.a. | −2.51 pp | 0% of 7 |
| ICICI Prudential Equity Savings Fund ICICIPRU · Equity Savings | fund manager | Oct 2017 | Jan 2021 | 40 | 7.3% p.a. | 7.0% p.a. | +0.21 pp | 75% of 4 |
| ICICI Prudential Mid Cap Fund ICICIPRU · Mid Cap | fund manager | May 2020 | Jun 2022 | 26 | 39.4% p.a. | 34.3% p.a. | +5.04 pp | under 3 yrs |
| ICICI Prudential Focused Fund ICICIPRU · Focused | fund manager | Jan 2021 | Jun 2022 | 18 | 17.3% p.a. | 11.5% p.a. | +5.81 pp | under 3 yrs |
| ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund ICICIPRU · Multi Cap | fund manager | Jul 2021 | Jun 2022 | 12 | 1.9% p.a. | 2.7% p.a. | −0.84 pp | under 3 yrs |
* dated by first appearance in the archive we hold, not by a date the factsheet printed. Months are the stint's calendar months. Returns are the fund's primary growth class and the category's median monthly return, compounded over the same months; “P4 in tenure” counts only rolling three-year windows that lie wholly inside the stint. A dash means the NAV or the category median did not cover the months — a category with too few funds in this build has no median.
Why this might matter
A fund's five-year figure belongs to whoever ran it for those five years. Following the person across funds is the only way to see a record that survives a change of employer — and to notice when a fund's record predates the people now running it.
Why it might not
co-managed funds attribute the same months to every named manager, so a record here is the team's before it is anyone's. A factsheet names the manager of record, not who made each call, and fund houses have processes and research desks that outlast individuals. Nothing on this page ranks anyone.