Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HSBC Value | Kotak Mid Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC ValueValue | itself | HSBC Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | HSBC Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 31% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Bandhan Value share 29% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and UTI Value share 30% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and HSBC Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HSBC Value share 31% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 43% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and HSBC Value share 29% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and HSBC Value share 30% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | UTI Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and UTI Value Fund share 49% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HSBC Value | Kotak Mid Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Bandhan AMC Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 11 | 83% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.12% points | 1.44% points | 1.06% points | 1.17% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 75% | not measured | 53% | 68% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs | not known | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 2.4% | 4.8% | −3.3% | −1.1% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 15.9% | 18.1% | 8.6% | 10.4% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 16.8% | 7.8% | 12.8% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.6% | −20.9% | −15.8% | −17.9% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹15,373 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.8 yrs | — | 5.1 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 86 · 32% | none disclosed | 76 · 48% | 68 · 47% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.