Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Multi Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | Bandhan Value | Axis Multicap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | HDFC Multi Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 36% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 23% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and Axis Multicap share 34% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Multi Cap share 36% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 44% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Axis Multicap share 28% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 12% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and HDFC Multi Cap share 23% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 44% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and Axis Multicap share 14% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 5% of their portfolios |
| Axis MulticapMulti Cap | Axis Multicap and HDFC Multi Cap share 34% of their portfolios | Axis Multicap and Nippon India Large Cap share 28% of their portfolios | Axis Multicap and Bandhan Value share 14% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Multicap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 23% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and HDFC Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 12% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Axis Multicap share 23% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Large Cap Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 44% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Multi Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | Bandhan Value | Axis Multicap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Large Cap | Value | Multi Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 73% of 22 | 73% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 100% of 22 | 49% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.30% points | 1.01% points | 1.17% points | 1.45% points | 1.03% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 79% | 57% | 68% | 96% | 108% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.2% | −4.7% | −1.1% | 9.8% | 6.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.0% | 11.1% | 10.4% | 20.0% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 12.8% | 12.8% | — | 15.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.2% | −15.4% | −17.9% | −18.1% | −17.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹20,765 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹9,775 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.4 yrs | 13 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 127 · 23% | 69 · 45% | 68 · 47% | 114 · 23% | 167 · 24% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.