Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value | HDFC Mid Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and HDFC Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Bandhan Value and HDFC Mid Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 31% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 5% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | HDFC Mid Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | HDFC Mid Cap and Bandhan Value share 10% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 13% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 13% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 13% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 13% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and Nippon India Multi Cap Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value | HDFC Mid Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Value | Mid Cap | Multi Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Bandhan AMC Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 24 | 67% of 109 | 66% of 109 | 50% of 109 | 49% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.62% points | 1.17% points | 0.92% points | 0.84% points | 1.03% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 68% | 38% | 66% | 108% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.2% | −1.1% | 6.6% | −1.4% | 6.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.3% | 10.4% | 17.6% | 13.5% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 12.8% | 18.9% | 16.4% | 15.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −21.0% | −17.9% | −16.8% | −18.6% | −17.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹1.07 lakh Cr | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 4.9 yrs | 10 mo | 14 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 68 · 47% | 81 · 37% | 123 · 29% | 167 · 24% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.