Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Kotak Multi Cap | Tata Value | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 24% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 25% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 13% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 62% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Multi Cap share 36% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 62% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 38% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and Tata Value share 13% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 36% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 38% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 62% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Multi Cap | Tata Value | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Tata Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 24 | 63% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 50% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.62% points | 1.15% points | 0.81% points | 1.06% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 81% | 45% | 53% | 66% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Vaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.2% | 0.2% | −5.3% | −3.3% | −1.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.3% | 12.9% | 10.6% | 8.6% | 13.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 13.3% | 10.9% | 7.8% | 16.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −21.0% | −20.9% | −15.4% | −15.8% | −18.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹80,822 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 11 yrs | 13 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 41 · 52% | 93 · 47% | 76 · 48% | 123 · 29% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.