Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Mirae Asset Midcap | UTI Value | Tata Value | HDFC Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset MidcapMid Cap | itself | Mirae Asset Midcap and UTI Value share 11% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Midcap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Midcap and HDFC Mid Cap share 21% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Mirae Asset Midcap share 11% of their portfolios | itself | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HDFC Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Midcap share 11% of their portfolios | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and HDFC Mid Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | HDFC Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap share 21% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and UTI Value share 11% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Tata Value share 7% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Midcap Fund and HDFC Mid Cap Fund share 21% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Midcap | UTI Value | Tata Value | HDFC Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Value | Value | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Tata Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 41% of 51 | 37% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 66% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.55% points | 0.79% points | 1.15% points | 0.92% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 89% | 47% | 81% | 38% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Jain · 7.2 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | not known |
| 1-year return | 9.1% | −4.1% | 0.2% | 6.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.4% | 12.1% | 12.9% | 17.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 15.8% | 11.0% | 13.3% | 18.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.5% | −17.2% | −20.9% | −16.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹20,000 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹1.07 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.1 yrs | 12 yrs | 11 yrs | 10 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 32% | 71 · 41% | 41 · 52% | 81 · 37% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.