Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential BSE 500 ETF |
|---|---|
| Category | Other ETFs |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 43% of 65 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 38% |
| Run by P7 | Nishit Patel · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | −31.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹367 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 8.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 503 · 30% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.