Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 17 |
|---|---|
| Category | Growth |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 75% of 8 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.03% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 129% |
| Run by P7 | Sankaran Naren · 3.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 66.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 9.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹21 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 10 · 100% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.