Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Other ETFs fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption | Nippon India Silver ETF | Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex | ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF | SBI Nifty 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ETF Nifty India ConsumptionOther ETFs | itself | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption and Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex share 24% of their portfolios | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 24% of their portfolios | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 25% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Silver ETFOther ETFs | Nippon India Silver ETF and Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption share 0% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Silver ETF and Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex share 0% of their portfolios | Nippon India Silver ETF and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 0% of their portfolios | Nippon India Silver ETF and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 0% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ETF BSE SensexOther ETFs | Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex and Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption share 24% of their portfolios | Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 100% of their portfolios | Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 83% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETFOther ETFs | ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF and Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption share 24% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF and Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex share 100% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 83% of their portfolios |
| SBI Nifty 50 ETFOther ETFs | SBI Nifty 50 ETF and Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption share 25% of their portfolios | SBI Nifty 50 ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios | SBI Nifty 50 ETF and Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex share 83% of their portfolios | SBI Nifty 50 ETF and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 83% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex and ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF share 100% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption | Nippon India Silver ETF | Nippon India ETF BSE Sensex | ICICI Prudential BSE Sensex ETF | SBI Nifty 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Other ETFs | Other ETFs | Other ETFs | Other ETFs | Other ETFs |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 56% of 109 | 85% of 20 | 45% of 109 | 45% of 109 | 2% of 99 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 32% | not measured | 31% | 31% | 32% |
| Run by P7 | Jitendra Tolani · 1.5 yrs | Vikram Dhawan · 4.5 yrs | Himanshu Mange · 2.7 yrs | Nishit Patel · 5.7 yrs | Viral Chhadva · 7 mo |
| 1-year return | −7.5% | 74.8% | −8.0% | −8.0% | −6.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.2% | 46.3% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 7.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.6% | — | 6.1% | 6.1% | 7.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −21.9% | −44.4% | −16.1% | −16.1% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹200 Cr | ₹30,898 Cr | ₹26,358 Cr | ₹32,675 Cr | ₹2.14 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 4.6 yrs | 12 yrs | 10 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 33 · 60% | 4 · 100% | 33 · 64% | 32 · 64% | 52 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.