Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI SMALL CAP | Motilal Oswal Midcap | UTI Value | Quant Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBI SMALL CAPSmall Cap | itself | SBI SMALL CAP and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 0% of their portfolios | SBI SMALL CAP and UTI Value share 2% of their portfolios | SBI SMALL CAP and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and SBI SMALL CAP share 0% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and UTI Value share 4% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Quant Small Cap share 2% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and SBI SMALL CAP share 2% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | itself | UTI Value and Quant Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios |
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | Quant Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 3% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 2% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and UTI Value share 6% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, UTI Value Fund and Quant Small Cap Fund, share 6%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what was wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI SMALL CAP | Motilal Oswal Midcap | UTI Value | Quant Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Small Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 49% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 37% of 109 | 69% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.31% points | 1.37% points | 0.79% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 54% | 92% | 47% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | R Srinivasan · ≥ 3 mo | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.6% | −0.5% | −4.1% | 12.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.3% | 19.5% | 12.1% | 18.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 14.2% | 21.1% | 11.0% | 19.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.4% | −28.9% | −17.2% | −24.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹39,942 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹34,069 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | 4.0 yrs | 12 yrs | 7.5 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 73 · 37% | 32 · 54% | 71 · 41% | 120 · 43% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.