Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Axis Midcap | HDFC Value | Nippon India Large Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axis MidcapMid Cap | itself | Axis Midcap and HDFC Value share 16% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and Nippon India Large Cap share 13% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 20% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 42% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and Axis Midcap share 16% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 11% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Axis Midcap share 13% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Value share 43% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 6% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Axis Midcap share 20% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and HDFC Value share 11% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Large Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Axis Midcap share 42% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 19% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Value Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 43% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Axis Midcap | HDFC Value | Nippon India Large Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Value | Large Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 44% of 109 | 53% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 87% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.36% points | 1.07% points | 1.01% points | 1.37% points | 0.86% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 80% | 54% | 57% | 92% | 52% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.9% | 5.9% | −4.7% | −0.5% | 7.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.1% | 16.2% | 11.1% | 19.5% | 18.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | 13.9% | 12.8% | 21.1% | 18.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.5% | −18.2% | −15.4% | −28.9% | −19.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹32,454 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.9 yrs | 10 mo | 13 yrs | 4.0 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 91 · 30% | 80 · 32% | 69 · 45% | 32 · 54% | 105 · 25% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.