Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Small Cap | HSBC Value | Bandhan Value | BANDHAN Small Cap | Quant Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and HSBC Value share 15% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 15% of their portfolios | itself | HSBC Value and Bandhan Value share 29% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HSBC Value share 29% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Quant Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and HSBC Value share 11% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 8% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios |
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and HSBC Value share 3% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 4% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HSBC Value Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 29% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Small Cap | HSBC Value | Bandhan Value | BANDHAN Small Cap | Quant Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Value | Value | Small Cap | Small Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | Bandhan AMC Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 90% of 109 | 100% of 11 | 67% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 69% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.10% points | 1.12% points | 1.17% points | 2.00% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 75% | 68% | 68% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | 8.9% | 2.4% | −1.1% | 10.4% | 12.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.1% | 15.9% | 10.4% | 25.3% | 18.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.0% | — | 12.8% | 20.0% | 19.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −24.2% | −19.6% | −17.9% | −22.8% | −24.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹34,069 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 3.8 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 7.5 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 257 · 16% | 86 · 32% | 68 · 47% | 265 · 30% | 120 · 43% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.