Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Small Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Quant Small Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | HDFC Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios |
| Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | Canara Robeco Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 56% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 2% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 56% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Quant Small Cap share 2% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 1% of their portfolios |
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 2% of their portfolios | itself | Quant Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Small CapSmall Cap | HDFC Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 2% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 1% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund and HDFC Large Cap Fund share 56% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Small Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Quant Small Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | HDFC Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Small Cap | Small Cap | Small Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | quant Money Managers Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 90% of 109 | 72% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 69% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.10% points | 1.38% points | 0.70% points | 0.84% points | 2.00% points | 1.25% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 40% | 45% | 75% | 68% | 46% |
| Run by P7 | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrs | not known | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 8.9% | −4.0% | −3.2% | 12.7% | 10.4% | −2.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.1% | 10.4% | 9.1% | 18.5% | 25.3% | 11.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.0% | 9.0% | 10.6% | 19.2% | 20.0% | 14.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −24.2% | −14.8% | −16.4% | −24.4% | −22.8% | −22.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹17,092 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹34,069 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹42,162 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 4.8 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 7.5 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 2.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 257 · 16% | 63 · 47% | 50 · 53% | 120 · 43% | 265 · 30% | 87 · 35% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.