Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Small Cap | SBI FLEXICAP | BANDHAN Small Cap | SBI SMALL CAP | Quant Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 10% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| SBI FLEXICAPFlexi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | itself | SBI FLEXICAP and BANDHAN Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | SBI FLEXICAP and SBI SMALL CAP share 5% of their portfolios | SBI FLEXICAP and Quant Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 6% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 4% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios |
| SBI SMALL CAPSmall Cap | SBI SMALL CAP and Nippon India Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | SBI SMALL CAP and SBI FLEXICAP share 5% of their portfolios | SBI SMALL CAP and BANDHAN Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | itself | SBI SMALL CAP and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios |
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 6% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 3% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Small Cap Fund and BANDHAN Small Cap Fund share 16% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Small Cap | SBI FLEXICAP | BANDHAN Small Cap | SBI SMALL CAP | Quant Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Flexi Cap | Small Cap | Small Cap | Small Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 90% of 109 | 58% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 49% of 109 | 69% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.10% points | 1.03% points | 2.00% points | 1.31% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 129% | 68% | 54% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Anup Upadhyay · ≥ 3 mo | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | R Srinivasan · ≥ 3 mo | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | 8.9% | −2.1% | 10.4% | 6.6% | 12.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.1% | 8.6% | 25.3% | 12.3% | 18.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.0% | 8.2% | 20.0% | 14.2% | 19.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −24.2% | −16.0% | −22.8% | −22.4% | −24.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹22,888 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹39,942 Cr | ₹34,069 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 7.5 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 257 · 16% | 71 · 36% | 265 · 30% | 73 · 37% | 120 · 43% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.