Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential R.I.G.H.T (Rewards of Investing & Generation of Healthy Tax-Savings) |
|---|---|
| Category | ELSS |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 80% of 25 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 49% |
| Run by P7 | not known |
| 1-year return | −5.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 8.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹40 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 23 · 65% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.