Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Kotak Multi Cap | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| Mahindra Manulife Multi CapMulti Cap | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 10% of their portfolios | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 14% of their portfolios | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 17% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 14% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Value and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Kotak Multi Cap | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Multi Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 99% of 77 | 68% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.62% points | 2.04% points | 0.83% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | not measured | 151% | 58% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | Vishal Jajoo · 10 mo | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 4.2% | 12.5% | −5.4% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 17.3% | 17.9% | 11.5% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | — | 16.0% | 13.5% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −21.0% | −20.2% | −14.0% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹7,471 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | — | 9.4 yrs | 13 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | none disclosed | 73 · 38% | 66 · 52% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.