Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | HSBC Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 31% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HSBC Value share 29% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and HSBC Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Nippon India Multi Cap and HSBC Value share 24% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and UTI Value share 30% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and Bandhan Value share 29% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | HSBC Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 24% of their portfolios | itself | HSBC Value and UTI Value share 30% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | UTI Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 30% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HSBC Value share 30% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | HSBC Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Multi Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 50% of 109 | 100% of 11 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.62% points | 0.84% points | 1.12% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | not measured | 66% | 75% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 4.2% | −1.4% | 2.4% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 17.3% | 13.5% | 15.9% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | — | 16.4% | — | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −21.0% | −18.6% | −19.6% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | — | 14 yrs | 3.8 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | none disclosed | 123 · 29% | 86 · 32% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.