Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 21% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 21% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 29% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value share 24% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 43% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 37% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 55% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 29% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 55% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 24% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 55% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Flexi Cap | Large Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 96% of 27 | 64% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.28% points | 1.06% points | 0.83% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 52% | 53% | 58% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 3.8% | −3.3% | −5.4% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 16.2% | 8.6% | 11.5% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 15.0% | 7.8% | 13.5% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −19.7% | −15.8% | −14.0% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 13 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 80 · 45% | 76 · 48% | 66 · 52% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.