Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap | HDFC Multi Cap | Nippon India Value | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 36% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Multi Cap share 23% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios |
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 36% of their portfolios | itself | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and HDFC Multi Cap share 19% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value share 30% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Multi CapMulti Cap | HDFC Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 23% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 19% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 31% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and Tata Value share 17% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 30% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Multi Cap share 31% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 25% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 37% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap | HDFC Multi Cap | Nippon India Value | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Flexi Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 91% of 109 | 73% of 22 | 93% of 109 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 0.84% points | 1.30% points | 0.82% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 29% | 79% | 82% | 81% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs | not known | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −5.1% | −2.2% | −2.8% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 12.8% | 12.0% | 14.0% | 12.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 11.5% | — | 13.4% | 13.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −11.0% | −20.2% | −17.6% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹1.46 lakh Cr | ₹20,765 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 5.0 yrs | 2.4 yrs | 12 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 116 · 52% | 127 · 23% | 94 · 36% | 41 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.