Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | Tata Value | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 44% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HSBC Value share 29% of their portfolios |
| Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 39% of their portfolios | itself | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and HSBC Value share 33% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 44% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and Tata Value share 23% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and HSBC Value share 31% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 24% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 23% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and HSBC Value share 18% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and Bandhan Value share 29% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 33% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 31% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Tata Value share 18% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 63% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | Tata Value | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 72% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 100% of 11 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.38% points | 1.01% points | 1.15% points | 1.12% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 40% | 57% | 81% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −4.0% | −4.7% | 0.2% | 2.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 10.4% | 11.1% | 12.9% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 9.0% | 12.8% | 13.3% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −14.8% | −15.4% | −20.9% | −19.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹17,092 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 4.8 yrs | 13 yrs | 11 yrs | 3.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 63 · 47% | 69 · 45% | 41 · 52% | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.