Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Axis Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Axis Large Cap share 31% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 21% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Axis Large CapLarge Cap | Axis Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 39% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and UTI Value share 41% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 21% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Axis Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value share 24% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and UTI Value share 29% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Axis Large Cap share 34% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 24% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Axis Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 29% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Axis Large Cap Fund and UTI Value Fund share 41% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Axis Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Flexi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 47% of 109 | 96% of 27 | 93% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.21% points | 1.28% points | 0.82% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 73% | 52% | 82% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −3.2% | 3.8% | −2.8% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 9.2% | 16.2% | 14.0% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 5.8% | 15.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −15.5% | −19.7% | −17.6% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹30,395 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 5.9 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 49 · 48% | 80 · 45% | 94 · 36% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.