Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Mirae Asset Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | Nippon India Value | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 43% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Tata Value share 22% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 8% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 7% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 10% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Tata Value share 3% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 25% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Large Cap share 22% of their portfolios | Tata Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and HDFC Large Cap Fund share 49% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Mirae Asset Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | Nippon India Value | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Small Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 93% of 109 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.06% points | 0.70% points | 2.00% points | 0.82% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 53% | 45% | 68% | 82% | 81% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | not known | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −3.3% | −3.2% | 10.4% | −2.8% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 8.6% | 9.1% | 25.3% | 14.0% | 12.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 7.8% | 10.6% | 20.0% | 13.4% | 13.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −15.8% | −16.4% | −22.8% | −17.6% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 12 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 76 · 48% | 50 · 53% | 265 · 30% | 94 · 36% | 41 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.