Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 8% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and UTI Value share 12% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI Value share 42% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | UTI Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 12% of their portfolios | UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 42% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Small Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.44% points | 1.10% points | 0.83% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | not measured | 68% | 58% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 4.8% | 8.9% | −5.4% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 18.1% | 16.1% | 11.5% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 16.8% | 19.0% | 13.5% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −20.9% | −24.2% | −14.0% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | — | 14 yrs | 13 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | none disclosed | 257 · 16% | 66 · 52% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.