Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Kotak Mid Cap | Axis Large Cap | Tata Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Bandhan Value and Axis Large Cap share 31% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Axis Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Axis Large CapLarge Cap | Axis Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Axis Large Cap and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and UTI Value share 41% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Tata Value and Axis Large Cap share 21% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | UTI Value and Axis Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Axis Large Cap Fund and UTI Value Fund share 41% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Kotak Mid Cap | Axis Large Cap | Tata Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Tata Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 47% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.44% points | 1.21% points | 1.15% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | not measured | 73% | 81% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | not known | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 4.8% | −3.2% | 0.2% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 18.1% | 9.2% | 12.9% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 16.8% | 5.8% | 13.3% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −20.9% | −15.5% | −20.9% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹30,395 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | — | 5.9 yrs | 11 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | none disclosed | 49 · 48% | 41 · 52% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.