Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HSBC Value share 29% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and HSBC Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Bandhan Value share 9% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HSBC Value share 15% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HSBC Value share 27% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and Bandhan Value share 29% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | HSBC Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 15% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 27% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 100% of 11 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.44% points | 0.86% points | 0.83% points | 1.12% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | not measured | 52% | 58% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 4.8% | 7.0% | −5.4% | 2.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 18.1% | 18.6% | 11.5% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 16.8% | 18.0% | 13.5% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −20.9% | −19.9% | −14.0% | −19.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | — | 14 yrs | 13 yrs | 3.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | none disclosed | 105 · 25% | 66 · 52% | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.