Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Value | HDFC Flexi Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Flexi Cap share 30% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 44% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and HDFC Flexi Cap share 32% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Flexi CapFlexi Cap | HDFC Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 30% of their portfolios | HDFC Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value share 32% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Flexi Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | HDFC Flexi Cap and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 44% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 42% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Flexi Cap share 41% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and UTI Value share 43% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HDFC Flexi Cap share 39% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 44% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Value | HDFC Flexi Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value | Flexi Cap | Large Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 0.82% points | 0.81% points | 1.01% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 82% | 48% | 57% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −2.8% | 0.7% | −4.7% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 14.0% | 15.8% | 11.1% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 13.4% | 16.6% | 12.8% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −17.6% | −13.3% | −15.4% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹1.13 lakh Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs | 2.4 yrs | 13 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 94 · 36% | 86 · 44% | 69 · 45% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.