Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | SBI MIDCAP | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Tata Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and SBI MIDCAP share 7% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Bandhan Value share 7% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MIDCAP and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 5% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Tata Value share 5% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and UTI Value share 9% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Bandhan Value share 4% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Tata Value share 12% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and UTI Value share 4% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 12% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and SBI MIDCAP share 9% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | SBI MIDCAP | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Tata Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 38% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.09% points | 1.37% points | 1.15% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 80% | 92% | 81% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 3.8% | −0.5% | 0.2% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 11.0% | 19.5% | 12.9% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 13.5% | 21.1% | 13.3% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −17.9% | −28.9% | −20.9% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 4.0 yrs | 11 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 64 · 28% | 32 · 54% | 41 · 52% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.