Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | SBI MIDCAP | Mirae Asset Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Value | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and SBI MIDCAP share 7% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios |
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Bandhan Value share 7% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MIDCAP and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and HDFC Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Value share 8% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Tata Value share 5% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 43% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Tata Value share 22% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and SBI MIDCAP share 8% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 25% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Large Cap share 22% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and HDFC Large Cap Fund share 49% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | SBI MIDCAP | Mirae Asset Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Value | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 38% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.09% points | 1.06% points | 0.70% points | 0.82% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 80% | 53% | 45% | 82% | 81% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | not known | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 3.8% | −3.3% | −3.2% | −2.8% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 11.0% | 8.6% | 9.1% | 14.0% | 12.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 13.5% | 7.8% | 10.6% | 13.4% | 13.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −17.9% | −15.8% | −16.4% | −17.6% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 12 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 64 · 28% | 76 · 48% | 50 · 53% | 94 · 36% | 41 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.