Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | HDFC Large Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Tata Value | HDFC Value | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Value share 31% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 56% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Tata Value share 22% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and HDFC Value share 39% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios |
| Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 39% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 56% of their portfolios | itself | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and HDFC Value share 47% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 41% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Large Cap share 22% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 24% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and HDFC Value share 15% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 47% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Tata Value share 15% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Large Cap Fund and Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund share 56% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | HDFC Large Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Tata Value | HDFC Value | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 72% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 53% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 0.70% points | 1.38% points | 1.15% points | 1.07% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 45% | 40% | 81% | 54% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | not known | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −3.2% | −4.0% | 0.2% | 5.9% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 9.1% | 10.4% | 12.9% | 16.2% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 10.6% | 9.0% | 13.3% | 13.9% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −16.4% | −14.8% | −20.9% | −18.2% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹17,092 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 4.8 yrs | 11 yrs | 10 mo | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 50 · 53% | 63 · 47% | 41 · 52% | 80 · 32% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.