Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | HDFC Large Cap | SBI MIDCAP | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Nippon India Value | HDFC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and SBI MIDCAP share 7% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Value share 31% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 8% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and HDFC Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Bandhan Value share 7% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and HDFC Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MIDCAP and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 5% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Value share 8% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and HDFC Value share 6% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Bandhan Value share 4% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and HDFC Large Cap share 8% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Value share 3% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and HDFC Value share 11% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and SBI MIDCAP share 8% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 3% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and SBI MIDCAP share 6% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 11% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Large Cap Fund and HDFC Value Fund share 39% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | HDFC Large Cap | SBI MIDCAP | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Nippon India Value | HDFC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 38% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 53% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 0.70% points | 1.09% points | 1.37% points | 0.82% points | 1.07% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 45% | 80% | 92% | 82% | 54% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | −3.2% | 3.8% | −0.5% | −2.8% | 5.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 9.1% | 11.0% | 19.5% | 14.0% | 16.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 10.6% | 13.5% | 21.1% | 13.4% | 13.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −16.4% | −17.9% | −28.9% | −17.6% | −18.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 4.0 yrs | 12 yrs | 10 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 50 · 53% | 64 · 28% | 32 · 54% | 94 · 36% | 80 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.