Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Tata Value | Kotak Flexi Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 25% of their portfolios | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | Kotak Flexi Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 43% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | UTI Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and UTI Value Fund share 49% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Flexi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Tata Value | Kotak Flexi Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value | Flexi Cap | Large Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 45% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.15% points | 1.09% points | 1.06% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 81% | not measured | 53% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | not known | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 0.2% | −1.6% | −3.3% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 12.9% | 11.5% | 8.6% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 13.3% | 10.6% | 7.8% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −20.9% | −16.3% | −15.8% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹54,857 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 11 yrs | — | 5.1 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 41 · 52% | none disclosed | 76 · 48% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.