Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Tata Value | Quant Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Quant Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Quant Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 24% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Quant Multi CapMulti Cap | Quant Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 9% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and Tata Value share 9% of their portfolios | itself | Quant Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 10% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 7% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Quant Multi Cap share 10% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Quant Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Tata Value | Quant Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value | Multi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | quant Money Managers Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 1.15% points | 0.93% points | 0.83% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 81% | 88% | 58% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 0.2% | 4.9% | −5.4% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 12.9% | 10.5% | 11.5% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 13.3% | 11.7% | 13.5% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −20.9% | −25.3% | −14.0% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹7,717 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 11 yrs | 6.9 yrs | 13 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 41 · 52% | 74 · 53% | 66 · 52% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.