Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap | HDFC Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Bandhan Value and HDFC Value share 31% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Bandhan Value share 9% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | Kotak Flexi Cap and HDFC Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | HDFC Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Value share 37% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Flexi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap | HDFC Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Flexi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 45% of 109 | 53% of 109 | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 0.86% points | 1.09% points | 1.07% points | 0.83% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 52% | not measured | 54% | 58% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | not known | not known | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 7.0% | −1.6% | 5.9% | −5.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 18.6% | 11.5% | 16.2% | 11.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 18.0% | 10.6% | 13.9% | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −19.9% | −16.3% | −18.2% | −14.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹54,857 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 14 yrs | — | 10 mo | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 105 · 25% | none disclosed | 80 · 32% | 66 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.