Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Bandhan Value | Quant Small Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandhan ValueValue | itself | Bandhan Value and Quant Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 44% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios |
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | Quant Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 4% of their portfolios | itself | Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Tata Value share 3% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 44% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 59% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Tata Value share 23% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 43% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 59% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 23% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 25% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Large Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 59% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Bandhan Value | Quant Small Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Small Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | quant Money Managers Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 109 | 69% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.17% points | 0.84% points | 1.01% points | 1.06% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 75% | 57% | 53% | 81% |
| Run by P7 | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | −1.1% | 12.7% | −4.7% | −3.3% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.4% | 18.5% | 11.1% | 8.6% | 12.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 19.2% | 12.8% | 7.8% | 13.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −24.4% | −15.4% | −15.8% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹34,069 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.9 yrs | 7.5 yrs | 13 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 47% | 120 · 43% | 69 · 45% | 76 · 48% | 41 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.