Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Aditya Birla Sun Life Value | BANDHAN Small Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI Value | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aditya Birla Sun Life ValueValue | itself | Aditya Birla Sun Life Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Aditya Birla Sun Life Value and Nippon India Value share 33% of their portfolios | Aditya Birla Sun Life Value and UTI Value share 31% of their portfolios | Aditya Birla Sun Life Value and Bandhan Value share 22% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Aditya Birla Sun Life Value share 10% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 10% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and UTI Value share 8% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 8% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Aditya Birla Sun Life Value share 33% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Aditya Birla Sun Life Value share 31% of their portfolios | UTI Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Aditya Birla Sun Life Value share 22% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: UTI Value Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Aditya Birla Sun Life Value | BANDHAN Small Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI Value | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Small Cap | Value | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 49% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 93% of 109 | 37% of 109 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.10% points | 2.00% points | 0.82% points | 0.79% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 68% | 82% | 47% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | Kunal Sangoi · ≥ 6 mo | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | 11.6% | 10.4% | −2.8% | −4.1% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.9% | 25.3% | 14.0% | 12.1% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 14.3% | 20.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.3% | −22.8% | −17.6% | −17.2% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹6,719 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 8.9 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 70 · 32% | 265 · 30% | 94 · 36% | 71 · 41% | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.