Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Ultra Short to Short Term fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI Ultra Short to Short Term | BANDHAN ULTRA SHORT TO SHORT TERM | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term | Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBI Ultra Short to Short TermUltra Short to Short Term | itself | SBI Ultra Short to Short Term and BANDHAN ULTRA SHORT TO SHORT TERM share 5% of their portfolios | SBI Ultra Short to Short Term and Tata Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios | SBI Ultra Short to Short Term and Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term share 7% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN ULTRA SHORT TO SHORT TERMUltra Short to Short Term | BANDHAN ULTRA SHORT TO SHORT TERM and SBI Ultra Short to Short Term share 5% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN ULTRA SHORT TO SHORT TERM and Tata Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios | BANDHAN ULTRA SHORT TO SHORT TERM and Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term share 7% of their portfolios |
| Tata Ultra Short to Short TermUltra Short to Short Term | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term and SBI Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term and BANDHAN ULTRA SHORT TO SHORT TERM share 0% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term and Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Ultra Short to Short TermUltra Short to Short Term | Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term and SBI Ultra Short to Short Term share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term and BANDHAN ULTRA SHORT TO SHORT TERM share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term and Tata Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, SBI Ultra Short to Short Term Fund and Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term Fund, share 7%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what was wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI Ultra Short to Short Term | BANDHAN ULTRA SHORT TO SHORT TERM | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term | Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra Short to Short Term | Ultra Short to Short Term | Ultra Short to Short Term | Ultra Short to Short Term |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 26% of 109 | 15% of 109 | 13% of 109 | 74% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.39% points | 0.23% points | 0.27% points | 0.53% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Sudhir Agrawal · ≥ 1 mo | Harshal Joshi · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Amit Somani · ≥ 9 mo | Vivek Sharma · 6.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.1% | 6.2% | 6.4% | 6.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.3% | 7.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.5% | 6.4% | 6.5% | 6.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.2% | −0.2% | −0.2% | −0.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹13,477 Cr | ₹6,583 Cr | ₹6,002 Cr | ₹8,356 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 1.3 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 50 · 48% | 80 · 45% | 77 · 34% | 112 · 26% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.