Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Mid Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Bandhan Value | Tata Value | Axis Midcap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | itself | HDFC Mid Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 8% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Bandhan Value share 10% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Tata Value share 7% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Axis Midcap share 31% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 8% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Tata Value share 22% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Axis Midcap share 10% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 12% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and HDFC Mid Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Axis Midcap share 5% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 9% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and HDFC Mid Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Large Cap share 22% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Axis Midcap share 14% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios |
| Axis MidcapMid Cap | Axis Midcap and HDFC Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and HDFC Large Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and Bandhan Value share 5% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and Tata Value share 14% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 42% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 12% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Bandhan Value share 9% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Axis Midcap share 42% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Axis Midcap Fund and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund share 42% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Mid Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Bandhan Value | Tata Value | Axis Midcap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Value | Value | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 66% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 44% of 109 | 87% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.92% points | 0.70% points | 1.17% points | 1.15% points | 1.36% points | 0.86% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 38% | 45% | 68% | 81% | 80% | 52% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | not known | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.6% | −3.2% | −1.1% | 0.2% | 6.9% | 7.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.6% | 9.1% | 10.4% | 12.9% | 17.1% | 18.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 18.9% | 10.6% | 12.8% | 13.3% | 13.5% | 18.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.8% | −16.4% | −17.9% | −20.9% | −19.5% | −19.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1.07 lakh Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹32,454 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 mo | 1.8 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 11 yrs | 5.9 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 81 · 37% | 50 · 53% | 68 · 47% | 41 · 52% | 91 · 30% | 105 · 25% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.