Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Kotak Mid Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 65% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 62% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 14% of their portfolios |
| Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 65% of their portfolios | itself | Canara Robeco Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 63% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 16% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 62% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 12% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 14% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 16% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 12% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund share 65% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Mid Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 83% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 72% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 87% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.44% points | 1.06% points | 1.38% points | 0.81% points | 0.86% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 53% | 40% | 45% | 52% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrs | Vaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.8% | −3.3% | −4.0% | −5.3% | 7.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.1% | 8.6% | 10.4% | 10.6% | 18.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.8% | 7.8% | 9.0% | 10.9% | 18.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −15.8% | −14.8% | −15.4% | −19.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹17,092 Cr | ₹80,822 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 5.1 yrs | 4.8 yrs | 13 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 76 · 48% | 63 · 47% | 93 · 47% | 105 · 25% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.