Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | HDFC Value | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Axis Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and HDFC Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Axis Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Value share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Axis Midcap share 4% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | HDFC Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Axis Midcap share 16% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Axis Midcap share 42% of their portfolios |
| Axis MidcapMid Cap | Axis Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Axis Midcap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 4% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and HDFC Value share 16% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 42% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and Axis Midcap Fund share 42% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | HDFC Value | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Axis Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Value | Value | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 83% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 53% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 44% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.44% points | 0.83% points | 1.07% points | 0.86% points | 1.36% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 58% | 54% | 52% | 80% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | not known | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 4.8% | −5.4% | 5.9% | 7.0% | 6.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.1% | 11.5% | 16.2% | 18.6% | 17.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.8% | 13.5% | 13.9% | 18.0% | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −14.0% | −18.2% | −19.9% | −19.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹32,454 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 13 yrs | 10 mo | 14 yrs | 5.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 66 · 52% | 80 · 32% | 105 · 25% | 91 · 30% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.