Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Arbitrage fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage | HDFC Arbitrage | SBI Arbitrage | Nippon India Arbitrage | Tata Arbitrage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential ArbitrageArbitrage | itself | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 50% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ArbitrageArbitrage | HDFC Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 57% of their portfolios | HDFC Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios | HDFC Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios |
| SBI ArbitrageArbitrage | SBI Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios | SBI Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 57% of their portfolios | itself | SBI Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios | SBI Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ArbitrageArbitrage | Nippon India Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 50% of their portfolios | Nippon India Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios | Nippon India Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios |
| Tata ArbitrageArbitrage | Tata Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios | Tata Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios | Tata Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios | Tata Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Arbitrage Fund and SBI Arbitrage Fund share 57% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage | HDFC Arbitrage | SBI Arbitrage | Nippon India Arbitrage | Tata Arbitrage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Arbitrage | Arbitrage | Arbitrage | Arbitrage | Arbitrage |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 109 | 28% of 109 | 38% of 109 | 100% of 109 | 100% of 58 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.60% points | 0.53% points | not measured | 0.70% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 128% | 117% | 98% | 118% | 263% |
| Run by P7 | Nikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrs | not known | Ardhendu Bhattacharya · ≥ 3 mo | Rohit Hashmukh Shah · 2.3 yrs | Sailesh Jain · ≥ 1.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.7% | 6.7% | 6.5% | 6.8% | 6.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.3% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 7.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.7% | 6.7% | 6.9% | 6.8% | 6.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.4% | −0.5% | −0.5% | −0.4% | −0.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹34,536 Cr | ₹25,229 Cr | ₹38,447 Cr | ₹16,560 Cr | ₹24,426 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 yrs | 2.4 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 14 yrs | 1.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 205 · 41% | 191 · 39% | 208 · 41% | 184 · 45% | 212 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.