Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | UTI Value | BANDHAN Small Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTI ValueValue | itself | UTI Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HSBC Value share 30% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and UTI Value share 8% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 7% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and HSBC Value share 11% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HSBC Value share 31% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and UTI Value share 30% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 31% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: UTI Value Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 49% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Value | BANDHAN Small Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Small Cap | Large Cap | Value |
| Fund house | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Bandhan AMC Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 37% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 64% of 109 | 100% of 11 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.79% points | 2.00% points | 1.06% points | 1.12% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 47% | 68% | 53% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs |
| 1-year return | −4.1% | 10.4% | −3.3% | 2.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.1% | 25.3% | 8.6% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.0% | 20.0% | 7.8% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.2% | −22.8% | −15.8% | −19.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 3.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 71 · 41% | 265 · 30% | 76 · 48% | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.