Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | UTI Value | Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Value | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTI ValueValue | itself | UTI Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HSBC Value share 30% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and HSBC Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Nippon India Value and HSBC Value share 28% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and UTI Value share 30% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | HSBC Value and Nippon India Value share 28% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: UTI Value Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Value | Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Value | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 37% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 100% of 11 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.79% points | 1.44% points | 0.82% points | 1.12% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 47% | not measured | 82% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | not known | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs |
| 1-year return | −4.1% | 4.8% | −2.8% | 2.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.1% | 18.1% | 14.0% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.0% | 16.8% | 13.4% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.2% | −20.9% | −17.6% | −19.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | — | 12 yrs | 3.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 71 · 41% | none disclosed | 94 · 36% | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.